Description
Dilithium is a signature algorithm, considered post-quantum, and recently standardized under the name ML-DSA by NIST. Due to its security and performance, it is recommended in most use cases.
During this presentation, I will outline the main ideas behind two studies, conducted in collaboration with Andersson Calle-Vierra, Benoît Cogliati, and Louis Goubin, which provide a better understanding of Dilithium's practical security.
I show that by introducing an error during the generation of the Dilithium signature, it is possible to force the signer to provide “incorrect” signatures that reveal information about the secret key in the form of inequalities on its coefficients. We then reformulate the problem of recovering the secret key from incorrect signatures into a linear programming problem.
Among the data in the MLWE instance (A,t), which is at the heart of Dilithium's construction, the least significant part of t—denoted by t0—is not included in the public key and is formally considered part of the secret key. Knowing t_0 has no impact on Dilithium's black box security, but it does allow for much more effective side-channel attacks. I explain the main ideas for constructing an attack that finds t0 from Dilithium signatures, again by twisting linear programming tools.
Both of these results use linear programming techniques that are somewhat deviated from their traditional uses, which is quite unusual for cryptanalysis of public-key algorithms.
Practical infos
Next sessions
- 
                              
    
            
                      
  
    
    
    Combining Partial Sums and FFT for the Fastest Known Attack on 6‑Round AESSpeaker : Shibam Ghosh - Inria The partial-sums technique introduced by Ferguson et al. (2000) achieved a 6‑round AES attack with time complexity 2^{52} S‑box evaluations, a benchmark that has stood since. In 2014, Todo and Aoki proposed a comparable approach based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). In this talk, I will show how to combine partial sums with FFT to get "the best of both worlds". The resulting attack on 6[…]- 
                                        
    
    Cryptography 
 
- 
                                        
    
    
- 
                              
    
            
                      
  
    
    
    Lie algebras and the security of cryptosystems based on classical varieties in disguiseSpeaker : Mingjie Chen - KU Leuven In 2006, de Graaf et al. proposed a strategy based on Lie algebras for finding a linear transformation in the projective linear group that connects two linearly equivalent projective varieties defined over the rational numbers. Their method succeeds for several families of “classical” varieties, such as Veronese varieties, which are known to have large automorphism groups. In this talk, we[…]- 
                                        
    
    Cryptography 
 
- 
                                        
    
    
- 
                              
    
      
                      
  
    
    
    Wagner’s Algorithm Provably Runs in Subexponential Time for SIS^∞Speaker : Johanna Loyer - Inria Saclay At CRYPTO 2015, Kirchner and Fouque claimed that a carefully tuned variant of the Blum-Kalai-Wasserman (BKW) algorithm (JACM 2003) should solve the Learning with Errors problem (LWE) in slightly subexponential time for modulus q = poly(n) and narrow error distribution, when given enough LWE samples. Taking a modular view, one may regard BKW as a combination of Wagner’s algorithm (CRYPTO 2002), run[…]- 
                                        
    
    Cryptography 
 
- 
                                        
    
    
- 
                              
    
      
                      
  
    
    
    CryptoVerif: a computationally-sound security protocol verifierSpeaker : Bruno Blanchet - Inria CryptoVerif is a security protocol verifier sound in the computational model of cryptography. It produces proofs by sequences of games, like those done manually by cryptographers. It has an automatic proof strategy and can also be guided by the user. It provides a generic method for specifying security assumptions on many cryptographic primitives, and can prove secrecy, authentication, and[…]- 
                                        
    
    Cryptography 
 
- 
                                        
    
    
- 
                              
    
            
                      
  
    
    
    Structured-Seed Local Pseudorandom Generators and their ApplicationsSpeaker : Nikolas Melissaris - IRIF We introduce structured‑seed local pseudorandom generators (SSL-PRGs), pseudorandom generators whose seed is drawn from an efficiently sampleable, structured distribution rather than uniformly. This seemingly modest relaxation turns out to capture many known applications of local PRGs, yet it can be realized from a broader family of hardness assumptions. Our main technical contribution is a[…]- 
                                        
    
    Cryptography 
 
-